CONSOLIDATED COPPERSTATE LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 719 (1969)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CONSOLIDATED COPPERSTATE LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 719 (1969)

394 U.S. 719

CONSOLIDATED COPPERSTATE LINES v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1128.
Decided April 21, 1969.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1141, Strickland Transportation Co., Inc. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

 293 F. Supp. 858, affirmed.

David Axelrod for appellant in No. 1128. Dennis G. Lyons and Joe A. Keith for appellant in No. 1141.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Nahum Litt, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al., T. S. Christopher for appellee Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc., and Carl L. Phinney for appellee Herrin Transportation Co. in both cases. Phillip Robinson for appellees Central Freight Lines, Inc., et al., and Reagan Sayers for appellee Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., in No. 1128. Robert E. Joyner, Phineas Stevens, and Charles D. Mathews for appellees Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., et al. in No. 1141.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 394 U.S. 719, 720

 


U.S. Supreme Court

CONSOLIDATED COPPERSTATE LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 719 (1969)

394 U.S. 719

CONSOLIDATED COPPERSTATE LINES v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1128.
Decided April 21, 1969.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1141, Strickland Transportation Co., Inc. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

 293 F. Supp. 858, affirmed.

David Axelrod for appellant in No. 1128. Dennis G. Lyons and Joe A. Keith for appellant in No. 1141.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Nahum Litt, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al., T. S. Christopher for appellee Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc., and Carl L. Phinney for appellee Herrin Transportation Co. in both cases. Phillip Robinson for appellees Central Freight Lines, Inc., et al., and Reagan Sayers for appellee Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., in No. 1128. Robert E. Joyner, Phineas Stevens, and Charles D. Mathews for appellees Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., et al. in No. 1141.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 394 U.S. 719, 720

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.