ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 718 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 718 (1969)
394 U.S. 718 ESTES EXPRESS LINES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1121.
Decided April 21, 1969.
292 F. Supp. 842, affirmed.
Harry J. Jordan for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William H. Marx and H. Merrill Pasco for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 718 (1969)
394 U.S. 718 ESTES EXPRESS LINES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1121.
Decided April 21, 1969.
292 F. Supp. 842, affirmed.
Harry J. Jordan for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William H. Marx and H. Merrill Pasco for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Page 394 U.S. 718, 719
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.