ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 718 (1969)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 718 (1969) 394 U.S. 718ESTES EXPRESS LINES ET AL. v. UNITED
STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1121.
Decided April 21, 1969.
292 F. Supp. 842, affirmed.
Harry J. Jordan for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William H. Marx and H. Merrill Pasco for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1121.
Decided April 21, 1969.
292 F. Supp. 842, affirmed. Harry J. Jordan for appellants. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William H. Marx and H. Merrill Pasco for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 394 U.S. 718, 719
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 718 (1969) 394 U.S. 718 ESTES EXPRESS LINES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1121.
Decided April 21, 1969.
292 F. Supp. 842, affirmed. Harry J. Jordan for appellants. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William H. Marx and H. Merrill Pasco for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 394 U.S. 718, 719
Search This Case
