OTTLEY v. LONG ISLAND COLLEGE HOSPITAL, 394 U.S. 716 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

OTTLEY v. LONG ISLAND COLLEGE HOSPITAL, 394 U.S. 716 (1969)

394 U.S. 716

OTTLEY ET AL. v. LONG ISLAND COLLEGE HOSPITAL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1045.
Decided April 21, 1969.

23 N.Y.2d 20, 241 N.E.2d 892, appeal dismissed.

Stephen C. Vladeck and Judith P. Vladeck for appellants.

Theodore R. Iserman and Frederick T. Shea for appellee.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus and Amy Juviler, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Attorney General of New York as amicus curiae in support of appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 716, 717

 


U.S. Supreme Court

OTTLEY v. LONG ISLAND COLLEGE HOSPITAL, 394 U.S. 716 (1969)

394 U.S. 716

OTTLEY ET AL. v. LONG ISLAND COLLEGE HOSPITAL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1045.
Decided April 21, 1969.

23 N.Y.2d 20, 241 N.E.2d 892, appeal dismissed.

Stephen C. Vladeck and Judith P. Vladeck for appellants.

Theodore R. Iserman and Frederick T. Shea for appellee.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus and Amy Juviler, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Attorney General of New York as amicus curiae in support of appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 716, 717

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.