KAUFER v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 458 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

KAUFER v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 458 (1969)

394 U.S. 458

KAUFER v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1041.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 406 F.2d 550, affirmed.

Frederick H. Block and Herbert Monte Levy for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Desist v. United States, ante, p. 244.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS dissent from the affirmance of the judgment.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.

Page 394 U.S. 458, 459

 


U.S. Supreme Court

KAUFER v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 458 (1969)

394 U.S. 458

KAUFER v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1041.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 406 F.2d 550, affirmed.

Frederick H. Block and Herbert Monte Levy for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Desist v. United States, ante, p. 244.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS dissent from the affirmance of the judgment.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.

Page 394 U.S. 458, 459

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.