HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UN. LOC. NO. 556 v. EMERY, 394 U.S. 455 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UN. LOC. NO. 556 v. EMERY, 394 U.S. 455 (1969)

394 U.S. 455

HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL NO. 556 ET AL. v. EMERY ET UX.,
DBA MAIN DINER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA. No. 988.
Decided April 1, 1969.

281 Minn. 334, 161 N. W. 2d 842, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Solly Robins, Stanford Robins, J. W. Brown, Benjamin Gettler, and Jonas Katz for appellants.

John S. Connolly for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


DeLURY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/455/case.html">394 U.S. 455</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 455 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DeLURY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 394 U.S. 455 (1969)

394 U.S. 455

DeLURY ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1029.
Decided April 1, 1969.

23 N. Y. 2d 175, 243 N. E. 2d 128, appeal dismissed.

Paul O'Dwyer, W. Bernard Richland, Morris Weissberg, and John J. DeLury, Jr., for appellants.

J. Lee Rankin, Frederic S. Nathan, and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 455, 456




U.S. Supreme Court

HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UN. LOC. NO. 556 v. EMERY, 394 U.S. 455 (1969)

394 U.S. 455

HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL NO. 556 ET AL. v. EMERY ET UX.,
DBA MAIN DINER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA. No. 988.
Decided April 1, 1969.

281 Minn. 334, 161 N. W. 2d 842, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Solly Robins, Stanford Robins, J. W. Brown, Benjamin Gettler, and Jonas Katz for appellants.

John S. Connolly for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


DeLURY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/455/case.html">394 U.S. 455</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 455 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DeLURY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 394 U.S. 455 (1969)

394 U.S. 455

DeLURY ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1029.
Decided April 1, 1969.

23 N. Y. 2d 175, 243 N. E. 2d 128, appeal dismissed.

Paul O'Dwyer, W. Bernard Richland, Morris Weissberg, and John J. DeLury, Jr., for appellants.

J. Lee Rankin, Frederic S. Nathan, and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 455, 456

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.