JONES v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 215 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
JONES v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 215 (1969) 394 U.S. 215JONES v. CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1072, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969.
263 Cal. App. 2d 818, 70 Cal. Rptr. 13, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
SUMRALL v. KIDD, 394 U.S. 215 (1969) 394 U.S. 215 SUMRALL v. KIDD ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 1167, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969. Vacated and remanded. Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant. Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97.
U.S. Supreme Court
JONES v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 215 (1969) 394 U.S. 215JONES v. CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1072, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969.
263 Cal. App. 2d 818, 70 Cal. Rptr. 13, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
SUMRALL v. KIDD, 394 U.S. 215 (1969) 394 U.S. 215 SUMRALL v. KIDD ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 1167, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969. Vacated and remanded. Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant. Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
