JONES v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 215 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 215 (1969) 394 U.S. 215

JONES v. CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1072, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969.

263 Cal. App. 2d 818, 70 Cal. Rptr. 13, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


SUMRALL v. KIDD, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/215/case.html">394 U.S. 215</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 215 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SUMRALL v. KIDD, 394 U.S. 215 (1969) 394 U.S. 215

SUMRALL v. KIDD ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 1167, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969.

Vacated and remanded.

Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant.

Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97.

Page 394 U.S. 215, 216

U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 215 (1969) 394 U.S. 215

JONES v. CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1072, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969.

263 Cal. App. 2d 818, 70 Cal. Rptr. 13, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


SUMRALL v. KIDD, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/215/case.html">394 U.S. 215</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 215 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SUMRALL v. KIDD, 394 U.S. 215 (1969) 394 U.S. 215

SUMRALL v. KIDD ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 1167, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969.

Vacated and remanded.

Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant.

Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97.

Page 394 U.S. 215, 216

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.