LICHTEN v. TEXAS, 393 U.S. 86 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
LICHTEN v. TEXAS, 393 U.S. 86 (1968)
393 U.S. 86 LICHTEN ET AL. v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 414.
Decided October 28, 1968.
434 S.W.2d 128, appeal dismissed.
Chris Dixie for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Hawthorne Phillips, Gilbert J. Pena, and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.
U.S. Supreme Court
LICHTEN v. TEXAS, 393 U.S. 86 (1968)
393 U.S. 86 LICHTEN ET AL. v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 414.
Decided October 28, 1968.
434 S.W.2d 128, appeal dismissed.
Chris Dixie for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Hawthorne Phillips, Gilbert J. Pena, and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.
Page 393 U.S. 86, 87
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
