OVERTON v. NEW YORK, 393 U.S. 85 (1968)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

OVERTON v. NEW YORK, 393 U.S. 85 (1968)

393 U.S. 85

OVERTON v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 212.
Decided October 28, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Melvin L. Wulf and David C. Gilberg for petitioner.

Carl A. Vergari and James J. Duggan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents and would affirm the judgment of conviction here.

Page 393 U.S. 85, 86




U.S. Supreme Court

OVERTON v. NEW YORK, 393 U.S. 85 (1968)

393 U.S. 85

OVERTON v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 212.
Decided October 28, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Melvin L. Wulf and David C. Gilberg for petitioner.

Carl A. Vergari and James J. Duggan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents and would affirm the judgment of conviction here.

Page 393 U.S. 85, 86

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.