MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 8 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 8 (1968)

393 U.S. 8

MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 52.
Decided October 14, 1968.

72 Wash. 2d 613, 434 P.2d 580, appeal dismissed.

James J. McArdle for appellant.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Timothy R. Malone and J. Richard Duggan, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Tax Commission of Washington.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, and Roger P. Marquis for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERT., INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/8/case.html">393 U.S. 8</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 8 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERT., INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, 393 U.S. 8 (1968)

393 U.S. 8

DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 114.
Decided October 14, 1968.

255 Cal. App. 2d 765, 63 Cal. Rptr. 543, appeal dismissed.

J. Perry Langford for appellant.

William Sabourin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 8, 9




U.S. Supreme Court

MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 8 (1968)

393 U.S. 8

MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 52.
Decided October 14, 1968.

72 Wash. 2d 613, 434 P.2d 580, appeal dismissed.

James J. McArdle for appellant.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Timothy R. Malone and J. Richard Duggan, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Tax Commission of Washington.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, and Roger P. Marquis for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERT., INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/8/case.html">393 U.S. 8</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 8 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERT., INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, 393 U.S. 8 (1968)

393 U.S. 8

DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 114.
Decided October 14, 1968.

255 Cal. App. 2d 765, 63 Cal. Rptr. 543, appeal dismissed.

J. Perry Langford for appellant.

William Sabourin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 8, 9

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.