MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 8 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 8 (1968) 393 U.S. 8MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF
WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 52.
Decided October 14, 1968.
72 Wash. 2d 613, 434 P.2d 580, appeal dismissed.
James J. McArdle for appellant.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Timothy R. Malone and J. Richard Duggan, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Tax Commission of Washington.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, and Roger P. Marquis for the United States, as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
393 U.S. 8 (1968) 393 U.S. 8 (1968) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERT., INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, 393 U.S. 8 (1968) 393 U.S. 8DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT.
No. 114.
Decided October 14, 1968.
255 Cal. App. 2d 765, 63 Cal. Rptr. 543, appeal dismissed.
J. Perry Langford for appellant.
William Sabourin for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 8 (1968) 393 U.S. 8 MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE v. TAX COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 52.
Decided October 14, 1968.
72 Wash. 2d 613, 434 P.2d 580, appeal dismissed. James J. McArdle for appellant. John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Timothy R. Malone and J. Richard Duggan, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Tax Commission of Washington. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, and Roger P. Marquis for the United States, as amicus curiae. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
393 U.S. 8 (1968) 393 U.S. 8 (1968) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERT., INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, 393 U.S. 8 (1968) 393 U.S. 8 DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 114.
Decided October 14, 1968.
255 Cal. App. 2d 765, 63 Cal. Rptr. 543, appeal dismissed. J. Perry Langford for appellant. William Sabourin for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 393 U.S. 8, 9