BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD, 393 U.S. 76 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD, 393 U.S. 76 (1968) 393 U.S. 76

BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 279. Decided October 21, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 395 F.2d 297, vacated and remanded.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, and for consideration of the other constitutional questions raised in the case.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.


IN RE HAGOPIAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/76/case.html">393 U.S. 76</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 76 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

IN RE HAGOPIAN, 393 U.S. 76 (1968) 393 U.S. 76

IN RE HAGOPIAN. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 352. Decided October 21, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file an amended jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 76, 77

U.S. Supreme Court

BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD, 393 U.S. 76 (1968) 393 U.S. 76

BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 279. Decided October 21, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 395 F.2d 297, vacated and remanded.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, and for consideration of the other constitutional questions raised in the case.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.


IN RE HAGOPIAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/76/case.html">393 U.S. 76</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 76 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

IN RE HAGOPIAN, 393 U.S. 76 (1968) 393 U.S. 76

IN RE HAGOPIAN. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 352. Decided October 21, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file an amended jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 76, 77

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.