NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969)

393 U.S. 536

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v.
LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 914.
Decided February 24, 1969.

23 N.Y.2d 1, 241 N.E.2d 730, appeal dismissed.

John A. Wells, Gerald E. Dwyer, and Victor F. Condello for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Joseph A. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Lefkowitz, and Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., and Harold C. Heiss for appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 393 U.S. 536, 537

 


U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969)

393 U.S. 536

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v.
LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 914.
Decided February 24, 1969.

23 N.Y.2d 1, 241 N.E.2d 730, appeal dismissed.

John A. Wells, Gerald E. Dwyer, and Victor F. Condello for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Joseph A. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Lefkowitz, and Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., and Harold C. Heiss for appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 393 U.S. 536, 537

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.