NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969)
393 U.S. 536 NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v.
LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 914.
Decided February 24, 1969.
23 N.Y.2d 1, 241 N.E.2d 730, appeal dismissed.
John A. Wells, Gerald E. Dwyer, and Victor F. Condello for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Joseph A. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Lefkowitz, and Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., and Harold C. Heiss for appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969)
393 U.S. 536 NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v.
LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 914.
Decided February 24, 1969.
23 N.Y.2d 1, 241 N.E.2d 730, appeal dismissed.
John A. Wells, Gerald E. Dwyer, and Victor F. Condello for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Joseph A. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Lefkowitz, and Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., and Harold C. Heiss for appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Page 393 U.S. 536, 537
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
