NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969) 393 U.S. 536NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 914.
Decided February 24, 1969.
23 N.Y.2d 1, 241 N.E.2d 730, appeal dismissed.
John A. Wells, Gerald E. Dwyer, and Victor F. Condello for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Joseph A. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Lefkowitz, and Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., and Harold C. Heiss for appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Opinions
LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 914.
Decided February 24, 1969.
23 N.Y.2d 1, 241 N.E.2d 730, appeal dismissed. John A. Wells, Gerald E. Dwyer, and Victor F. Condello for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Joseph A. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Lefkowitz, and Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., and Harold C. Heiss for appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Page 393 U.S. 536, 537
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969) 393 U.S. 536 NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v.LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 914.
Decided February 24, 1969.
23 N.Y.2d 1, 241 N.E.2d 730, appeal dismissed. John A. Wells, Gerald E. Dwyer, and Victor F. Condello for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Joseph A. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Lefkowitz, and Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., and Harold C. Heiss for appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Page 393 U.S. 536, 537
Search This Case
