NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE v. U.S., 393 U.S. 535 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE v. U.S., 393 U.S. 535 (1969)

393 U.S. 535

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 898.
Decided February 24, 1969.

287 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.

John F. Donelan, John M. Cleary, Arthur A. Arsham, and John J. C. Martin for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., LeGrand A. Carlston, Z. L. Pearson, Jr., and Bryce Rea, Jr., for Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., and Mr. Rea for Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 393 U.S. 535, 536




U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE v. U.S., 393 U.S. 535 (1969)

393 U.S. 535

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 898.
Decided February 24, 1969.

287 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.

John F. Donelan, John M. Cleary, Arthur A. Arsham, and John J. C. Martin for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., LeGrand A. Carlston, Z. L. Pearson, Jr., and Bryce Rea, Jr., for Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., and Mr. Rea for Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 393 U.S. 535, 536

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.