NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE v. U.S., 393 U.S. 535 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE v. U.S., 393 U.S. 535 (1969)
393 U.S. 535 NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 898.
Decided February 24, 1969.
287 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.
John F. Donelan, John M. Cleary, Arthur A. Arsham, and John J. C. Martin for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., LeGrand A. Carlston, Z. L. Pearson, Jr., and Bryce Rea, Jr., for Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., and Mr. Rea for Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE v. U.S., 393 U.S. 535 (1969)
393 U.S. 535 NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 898.
Decided February 24, 1969.
287 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.
John F. Donelan, John M. Cleary, Arthur A. Arsham, and John J. C. Martin for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., LeGrand A. Carlston, Z. L. Pearson, Jr., and Bryce Rea, Jr., for Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., and Mr. Rea for Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Page 393 U.S. 535, 536
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.