DUNCAN v. INDIANA
393 U.S. 533 (1969)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
DUNCAN v. INDIANA, 393 U.S. 533 (1969)
393 U.S. 533 DUNCAN v. INDIANA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 110, Misc.
Decided February 24, 1969.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374.
U.S. Supreme Court
TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT, 393 U.S. 533 (1969)
393 U.S. 533 TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 57, Misc.
Decided February 24, 1969.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374.
