BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, 393 U.S. 530 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA.
No. 883.
Decided February 24, 1969.
151 Mont. 526, 445 P.2d 574, appeal dismissed.
Thomas E. Towe for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
U.S. Supreme Court
ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC. v. MALE, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC., ET AL. v.
MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 889.
Decided February 24, 1969.
51 N. J. 107, 237 A. 2d 880, appeal dismissed.
Edward B. Meredith for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA.
No. 883.
Decided February 24, 1969.
151 Mont. 526, 445 P.2d 574, appeal dismissed.
Thomas E. Towe for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
U.S. Supreme Court
ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC. v. MALE, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC., ET AL. v.
MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 889.
Decided February 24, 1969.
51 N. J. 107, 237 A. 2d 880, appeal dismissed.
Edward B. Meredith for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
