MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON, 393 U.S. 529 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529

MORGAN ET AL. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON. No. 632. Decided February 24, 1969.

250 Ore. 460, 443 P.2d 236, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Ervin W. Potter for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Thomas C. Stacer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


FORAN v. WEINHOFF, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/529/case.html">393 U.S. 529</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 529 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FORAN v. WEINHOFF, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529

FORAN v. WEINHOFF ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 870. Decided February 24, 1969.

291 F. Supp. 498, appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 529, 530

U.S. Supreme Court

MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529

MORGAN ET AL. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON. No. 632. Decided February 24, 1969.

250 Ore. 460, 443 P.2d 236, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Ervin W. Potter for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Thomas C. Stacer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


FORAN v. WEINHOFF, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/529/case.html">393 U.S. 529</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 529 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FORAN v. WEINHOFF, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529

FORAN v. WEINHOFF ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 870. Decided February 24, 1969.

291 F. Supp. 498, appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 529, 530

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.