COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SHAW-WALKER CO., 393 U.S. 478 (1969)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SHAW-WALKER CO., 393 U.S. 478 (1969)

393 U.S. 478

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SHAW-WALKER CO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 95.
Decided January 27, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 390 F.2d 205, vacated and remanded.

Solicitor General Griswold for petitioner.

Richard E. Nolan and John P. Carroll, Jr., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of United States v. Donruss Co., ante, p. 297.

Page 393 U.S. 478, 479

 


U.S. Supreme Court

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SHAW-WALKER CO., 393 U.S. 478 (1969)

393 U.S. 478

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SHAW-WALKER CO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 95.
Decided January 27, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 390 F.2d 205, vacated and remanded.

Solicitor General Griswold for petitioner.

Richard E. Nolan and John P. Carroll, Jr., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of United States v. Donruss Co., ante, p. 297.

Page 393 U.S. 478, 479

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.