DICKINSON v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD, 393 U.S. 409 (1969)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

DICKINSON v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD, 393 U.S. 409 (1969)

393 U.S. 409

DICKINSON, COMPTROLLER OF FLORIDA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 741.
Decided January 20, 1969.

Affirmed.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Fred M. Burns and Larry Levy, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.

O. Ralph Matousek for appellee First National Bank of Homestead.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 393 U.S. 409, 410

 


U.S. Supreme Court

DICKINSON v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD, 393 U.S. 409 (1969)

393 U.S. 409

DICKINSON, COMPTROLLER OF FLORIDA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 741.
Decided January 20, 1969.

Affirmed.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Fred M. Burns and Larry Levy, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.

O. Ralph Matousek for appellee First National Bank of Homestead.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 393 U.S. 409, 410

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.