SNELL v. WYMAN, 393 U.S. 323 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

SNELL v. WYMAN, 393 U.S. 323 (1969)

393 U.S. 323

SNELL ET AL. v.
WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 191.
Decided January 13, 1969.

281 F. Supp. 853, affirmed.

James J. Graham and Martin Garbus for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorneys General, for Wyman, and J. Lee Rankin and Stanley Buchsbaum for Ginsberg, appellees.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Peter L. Strauss, and Morton Hollander for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 323, 324




U.S. Supreme Court

SNELL v. WYMAN, 393 U.S. 323 (1969)

393 U.S. 323

SNELL ET AL. v.
WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 191.
Decided January 13, 1969.

281 F. Supp. 853, affirmed.

James J. Graham and Martin Garbus for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorneys General, for Wyman, and J. Lee Rankin and Stanley Buchsbaum for Ginsberg, appellees.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Peter L. Strauss, and Morton Hollander for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 323, 324

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.