ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC. v. DORNBOS, 393 U.S. 322 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC. v. DORNBOS, 393 U.S. 322 (1969) 393 U.S. 322

ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC., ET AL. v. DORNBOS ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 738. Decided January 13, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

H. Winston Hathaway for appellants.

Harold S. Sawyer for appellees Dornbos et al., and Robert E. Plunkett for appellee The Kroger Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final judgment.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


BROWN v. COINER, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/322/case.html">393 U.S. 322</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 322 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BROWN v. COINER, 393 U.S. 322 (1969) 393 U.S. 322

BROWN v. COINER, WARDEN. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 871, Misc. Decided January 13, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 322, 323

U.S. Supreme Court

ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC. v. DORNBOS, 393 U.S. 322 (1969) 393 U.S. 322

ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC., ET AL. v. DORNBOS ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 738. Decided January 13, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

H. Winston Hathaway for appellants.

Harold S. Sawyer for appellees Dornbos et al., and Robert E. Plunkett for appellee The Kroger Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final judgment.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


BROWN v. COINER, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/322/case.html">393 U.S. 322</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 322 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BROWN v. COINER, 393 U.S. 322 (1969) 393 U.S. 322

BROWN v. COINER, WARDEN. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 871, Misc. Decided January 13, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 322, 323

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.