HILLIARD v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE,
393 U.S. 321 (1969)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
HILLIARD v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, 393 U.S. 321 (1969)
393 U.S. 321 HILLIARD v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 745.
Decided January 13, 1969.
213 So.2d 689, appeal dismissed.
Richard W. Wilson for appellant.
Osee R. Fagan for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, 393 U.S. 321 (1969)
393 U.S. 321 MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 756.
Decided January 13, 1969.
221 Tenn. 724, 431 S. W. 2d 277, appeal dismissed.
H. Vincent E. Mitchell and J. Martin Regan for appellant.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
