WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319

WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 706. Decided January 13, 1969.

430 Pa. 509, 244 A. 2d 37, appeal dismissed.

Norman J. Cowie for appellant.

Robert E. Dauer for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


COX v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/319/case.html">393 U.S. 319</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 319 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COX v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319

COX ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 708. Decided January 13, 1969.

Affirmed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 393 U.S. 319, 320

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319

WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 706. Decided January 13, 1969.

430 Pa. 509, 244 A. 2d 37, appeal dismissed.

Norman J. Cowie for appellant.

Robert E. Dauer for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


COX v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/319/case.html">393 U.S. 319</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 319 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COX v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319

COX ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 708. Decided January 13, 1969.

Affirmed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 393 U.S. 319, 320

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.