WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319 WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 706.
Decided January 13, 1969.
430 Pa. 509, 244 A.2d 37, appeal dismissed.
Norman J. Cowie for appellant.
Robert E. Dauer for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
COX v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319 COX ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 708.
Decided January 13, 1969.
Affirmed.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319 WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 706.
Decided January 13, 1969.
430 Pa. 509, 244 A.2d 37, appeal dismissed.
Norman J. Cowie for appellant.
Robert E. Dauer for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
COX v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319 COX ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 708.
Decided January 13, 1969.
Affirmed.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Page 393 U.S. 319, 320
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
