ESTRIN v. MOSS, 393 U.S. 318 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

ESTRIN v. MOSS, 393 U.S. 318 (1969) 393 U.S. 318

ESTRIN ET AL. v. MOSS, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 684.
Decided January 13, 1969.

221 Tenn. 657, 430 S.W.2d 345, appeal dismissed.

Robert W. Healy for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Paul E. Jennings, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

WARD v. JOHNSON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/318/case.html">393 U.S. 318</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 318 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WARD v. JOHNSON, 393 U.S. 318 (1969) 393 U.S. 318

WARD ET AL. v. JOHNSON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 703.
Decided January 13, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Griswold for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 393 U.S. 318, 319

 


U.S. Supreme Court

ESTRIN v. MOSS, 393 U.S. 318 (1969) 393 U.S. 318

ESTRIN ET AL. v. MOSS, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 684.
Decided January 13, 1969.

221 Tenn. 657, 430 S.W.2d 345, appeal dismissed.

Robert W. Healy for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Paul E. Jennings, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

WARD v. JOHNSON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/318/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/393/318/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/393/318/">393 U.S. 318</a></a></a> (1969) 393 U.S. 318 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WARD v. JOHNSON, 393 U.S. 318 (1969) 393 U.S. 318

WARD ET AL. v. JOHNSON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 703.
Decided January 13, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Griswold for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 393 U.S. 318, 319

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.