ESTRIN v. MOSS, 393 U.S. 318 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTRIN v. MOSS, 393 U.S. 318 (1969) 393 U.S. 318 ESTRIN ET AL. v. MOSS, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 684.
Decided January 13, 1969.
221 Tenn. 657, 430 S.W.2d 345, appeal dismissed.
Robert W. Healy for appellants.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Paul E. Jennings, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
WARD v. JOHNSON, 393 U.S. 318 (1969) 393 U.S. 318 WARD ET AL. v. JOHNSON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 703.
Decided January 13, 1969.
Appeal dismissed.
Solicitor General Griswold for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTRIN v. MOSS, 393 U.S. 318 (1969) 393 U.S. 318 ESTRIN ET AL. v. MOSS, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 684.
Decided January 13, 1969.
221 Tenn. 657, 430 S.W.2d 345, appeal dismissed.
Robert W. Healy for appellants.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Paul E. Jennings, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
WARD v. JOHNSON, 393 U.S. 318 (1969) 393 U.S. 318 WARD ET AL. v. JOHNSON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 703.
Decided January 13, 1969.
Appeal dismissed.
Solicitor General Griswold for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Page 393 U.S. 318, 319
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
