BOYD v. CLARK, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

BOYD v. CLARK, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

393 U.S. 316

BOYD ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 490.
Decided January 13, 1969.

287 F. Supp. 561, affirmed.

Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, Clark v. Gabriel, ante, p. 256, without reaching the jurisdictional question raised under 28 U.S.C. 1331.

MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC. v. WASHINGTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/316/case.html">393 U.S. 316</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 316 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC. v. WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

393 U.S. 316

MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC., ET AL. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 648.
Decided January 13, 1969.

73 Wash. 2d 405, 439 P.2d 248, appeal dismissed.

Alfred J. Schweppe and Thomas R. Beierle for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 316, 317




U.S. Supreme Court

BOYD v. CLARK, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

393 U.S. 316

BOYD ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 490.
Decided January 13, 1969.

287 F. Supp. 561, affirmed.

Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, Clark v. Gabriel, ante, p. 256, without reaching the jurisdictional question raised under 28 U.S.C. 1331.

MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC. v. WASHINGTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/316/case.html">393 U.S. 316</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 316 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC. v. WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

393 U.S. 316

MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC., ET AL. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 648.
Decided January 13, 1969.

73 Wash. 2d 405, 439 P.2d 248, appeal dismissed.

Alfred J. Schweppe and Thomas R. Beierle for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 316, 317

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.