STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 393 U.S. 267 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 393 U.S. 267 (1968)
393 U.S. 267 STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 609.
Decided December 16, 1968.
262 Cal. App. 2d 118, 68 Cal. Rptr. 512, appeal dismissed.
Francis R. Kirkham, Francis N. Marshall, and Marcus Mattson for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh, Gilmore Tillman, Henry E. Kappler, and Ellis J. Horvitz for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.'
U.S. Supreme Court
STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 393 U.S. 267 (1968)
393 U.S. 267 STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 609.
Decided December 16, 1968.
262 Cal. App. 2d 118, 68 Cal. Rptr. 512, appeal dismissed.
Francis R. Kirkham, Francis N. Marshall, and Marcus Mattson for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh, Gilmore Tillman, Henry E. Kappler, and Ellis J. Horvitz for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.'
Page 393 U.S. 267, 268
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
