WILSON v. KELLEY, 393 U.S. 266 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

WILSON v. KELLEY, 393 U.S. 266 (1968)

393 U.S. 266

WILSON ET AL. v. KELLEY, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 561.
Decided December 16, 1968.

Affirmed.

Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Howard Moore, Jr., P. Walter Jones, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, and Martin Garbus for appellants.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon, Mathew Robins, and W. Wheeler Bryan, Assistant Attorneys General, and Don L. Hartman, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 266, 267




U.S. Supreme Court

WILSON v. KELLEY, 393 U.S. 266 (1968)

393 U.S. 266

WILSON ET AL. v. KELLEY, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 561.
Decided December 16, 1968.

Affirmed.

Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Howard Moore, Jr., P. Walter Jones, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, and Martin Garbus for appellants.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon, Mathew Robins, and W. Wheeler Bryan, Assistant Attorneys General, and Don L. Hartman, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 266, 267

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.