ANDERSEN v. FLORIDA
393 U.S. 22 (1968)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

ANDERSEN v. FLORIDA, 393 U.S. 22 (1968)

393 U.S. 22

ANDERSEN ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 335.
Decided October 14, 1968.

208 So.2d 814, appeal dismissed.

William Y. Akerman for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MUNIZ v. BETO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/22/case.html">393 U.S. 22</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 22 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MUNIZ v. BETO, 393 U.S. 22 (1968)

393 U.S. 22

MUNIZ v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 430, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Joseph A. Calamia for appellant.

Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Flowers and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, and W. Barton Boling for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 22, 23




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.