ANDERSEN v. FLORIDA,
393 U.S. 22 (1968)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSEN v. FLORIDA, 393 U.S. 22 (1968)
393 U.S. 22 ANDERSEN ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 335.
Decided October 14, 1968.
208 So.2d 814, appeal dismissed.
William Y. Akerman for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MUNIZ v. BETO, 393 U.S. 22 (1968)
393 U.S. 22 MUNIZ v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 430, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Joseph A. Calamia for appellant.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Flowers and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, and W. Barton Boling for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
