STILES v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 219 (1968)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

STILES v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 219 (1968)

393 U.S. 219

STILES v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
No. 74.
Argued November 20, 1968.
Decided December 9, 1968.

Certiorari dismissed.

Charles J. Rogers, Jr., by appointment of the Court, post, p. 813, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Lawrence P. Cohen.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 393 U.S. 219, 220




U.S. Supreme Court

STILES v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 219 (1968)

393 U.S. 219

STILES v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
No. 74.
Argued November 20, 1968.
Decided December 9, 1968.

Certiorari dismissed.

Charles J. Rogers, Jr., by appointment of the Court, post, p. 813, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Lawrence P. Cohen.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 393 U.S. 219, 220

Oral Argument - November 20, 1968
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.