ATCHISON v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 214 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
ATCHISON v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 214 (1968) 393 U.S. 214 ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 520.
Decided November 25, 1968.
287 F. Supp. 354, affirmed.
S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., and Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, William R. McDowell, Thomas L. Farmer, and Thomas A. Loose for the Texas & Pacific Railway Co. et al., appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Richard Maguire and Gavin W. O'Brien for the Permian Basin Railroad Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF AUSTIN v. WEBSTER, 393 U.S. 214 (1968) 393 U.S. 214 CITY OF AUSTIN v. WEBSTER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 499.
Decided November 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
James W. Wilson for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
ATCHISON v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 214 (1968) 393 U.S. 214 ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 520.
Decided November 25, 1968.
287 F. Supp. 354, affirmed.
S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., and Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, William R. McDowell, Thomas L. Farmer, and Thomas A. Loose for the Texas & Pacific Railway Co. et al., appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Richard Maguire and Gavin W. O'Brien for the Permian Basin Railroad Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF AUSTIN v. WEBSTER, 393 U.S. 214 (1968) 393 U.S. 214 CITY OF AUSTIN v. WEBSTER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 499.
Decided November 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
James W. Wilson for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 393 U.S. 214, 215
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
