ATCHISON v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 214 (1968)
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. U.S. Supreme Court
ATCHISON v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 214 (1968) 393 U.S. 214
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 520.
Decided November 25, 1968.
287 F. Supp. 354, affirmed.
S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., and Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, William R. McDowell, Thomas L. Farmer, and Thomas A. Loose for the Texas & Pacific Railway Co. et al., appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Richard Maguire and Gavin W. O'Brien for the Permian Basin Railroad Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF AUSTIN v. WEBSTER, 393 U.S. 214 (1968) 393 U.S. 214 CITY OF AUSTIN v. WEBSTER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 499.
Decided November 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
James W. Wilson for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
ATCHISON v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 214 (1968) 393 U.S. 214 ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 520.
Decided November 25, 1968.
287 F. Supp. 354, affirmed.
S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., and Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, William R. McDowell, Thomas L. Farmer, and Thomas A. Loose for the Texas & Pacific Railway Co. et al., appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Richard Maguire and Gavin W. O'Brien for the Permian Basin Railroad Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF AUSTIN v. WEBSTER, 393 U.S. 214 (1968) 393 U.S. 214 CITY OF AUSTIN v. WEBSTER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 499.
Decided November 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
James W. Wilson for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 393 U.S. 214, 215
