ILOWITE v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 15 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

ILOWITE v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 15 (1968)

393 U.S. 15

ILOWITE v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 263.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 390 F.2d 589, vacated and remanded with directions to dismiss the case as moot.

Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin, Michael B. Standard, and David Rosenberg for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold and Henry Geller for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness and an examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the case as moot.


BUTLER v. BRIERLEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/15/case.html">393 U.S. 15</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 15 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BUTLER v. BRIERLEY, 393 U.S. 15 (1968)

393 U.S. 15

BUTLER v. BRIERLEY, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 197, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Stephen J. McEwen, Jr., and Vram Nedurian, Jr., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 15, 16




U.S. Supreme Court

ILOWITE v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 15 (1968)

393 U.S. 15

ILOWITE v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 263.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 390 F.2d 589, vacated and remanded with directions to dismiss the case as moot.

Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin, Michael B. Standard, and David Rosenberg for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold and Henry Geller for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness and an examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the case as moot.


BUTLER v. BRIERLEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/15/case.html">393 U.S. 15</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 15 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BUTLER v. BRIERLEY, 393 U.S. 15 (1968)

393 U.S. 15

BUTLER v. BRIERLEY, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 197, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Stephen J. McEwen, Jr., and Vram Nedurian, Jr., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 15, 16

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.