LEWINSON v. CREWS, 393 U.S. 13 (1968)
LEWINSON v. CREWS, COUNTY CLERK OF KINGS COUNTY. U.S. Supreme Court
LEWINSON v. CREWS, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 230.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
Emanuel Redfield for appellant.
Seymour Besunder for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13 ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 239.
Decided October 14, 1968.
___ Colo. ___, 439 P.2d 38, appeal dismissed.
Lawrence Speiser for appellant.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Richard D. Robb, Assistant Attorney General, and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEWINSON v. CREWS, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13 LEWINSON v. CREWS, COUNTY CLERK OF KINGS COUNTY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 230.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
Emanuel Redfield for appellant.
Seymour Besunder for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13 ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 239.
Decided October 14, 1968.
___ Colo. ___, 439 P.2d 38, appeal dismissed.
Lawrence Speiser for appellant.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Richard D. Robb, Assistant Attorney General, and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Page 393 U.S. 13, 14
