LEWINSON v. CREWS, 393 U.S. 13 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
LEWINSON v. CREWS, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13 LEWINSON v. CREWS, COUNTY CLERK OF KINGS COUNTY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 230.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
Emanuel Redfield for appellant.
Seymour Besunder for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13 ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 239.
Decided October 14, 1968.
___ Colo. ___, 439 P.2d 38, appeal dismissed.
Lawrence Speiser for appellant.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Richard D. Robb, Assistant Attorney General, and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEWINSON v. CREWS, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13 LEWINSON v. CREWS, COUNTY CLERK OF KINGS COUNTY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 230.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
Emanuel Redfield for appellant.
Seymour Besunder for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13 ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 239.
Decided October 14, 1968.
___ Colo. ___, 439 P.2d 38, appeal dismissed.
Lawrence Speiser for appellant.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Richard D. Robb, Assistant Attorney General, and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Page 393 U.S. 13, 14
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
