ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH, 393 U.S. 127 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH, 393 U.S. 127 (1968) 393 U.S. 127 ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v.
LETH, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OF OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 417.
Decided November 12, 1968.
292 F. Supp. 615, affirmed.
Thomas H. Tongue for appellants.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
DOOLIN v. KORSHAK, 393 U.S. 127 (1968) 393 U.S. 127 DOOLIN, DBA NATIONAL NOVELTY CO., ET AL.
v. KORSHAK, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 439.
Decided November 12, 1968.
39 Ill. 2d 521, 236 N.E.2d 897, appeal dismissed.
Owen Rall for appellants.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH, 393 U.S. 127 (1968) 393 U.S. 127 ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v.
LETH, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OF OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 417.
Decided November 12, 1968.
292 F. Supp. 615, affirmed.
Thomas H. Tongue for appellants.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
DOOLIN v. KORSHAK, 393 U.S. 127 (1968) 393 U.S. 127 DOOLIN, DBA NATIONAL NOVELTY CO., ET AL.
v. KORSHAK, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 439.
Decided November 12, 1968.
39 Ill. 2d 521, 236 N.E.2d 897, appeal dismissed.
Owen Rall for appellants.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 393 U.S. 127, 128
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
