LEE v. U.S., 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

LEE v. U.S. , 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)

393 U.S. 1053

Ardell LEE, etc., et al., petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 782.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 20, 1969

Lee S. Kreindler and Samuel N. Hecsh, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Leonard Schaitman, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.[ Lee v. U.S. 393 U.S. 1053 (1969) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

LEE v. U.S. , 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)

393 U.S. 1053

Ardell LEE, etc., et al., petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 782.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 20, 1969

Lee S. Kreindler and Samuel N. Hecsh, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Leonard Schaitman, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.[ Lee v. U.S. 393 U.S. 1053 (1969) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.