TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968) 392 U.S. 667TAGGART v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1668, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
20 N.Y.2d 335, 229 N.E.2d 581; 21 N.Y.2d 729, 234 N.E.2d 714, appeal dismissed.
Leon B. Polsky for appellant.
Thomas J. Mackell and Peter J. O'Connor for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by Rule 11.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1668, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
20 N.Y.2d 335, 229 N.E.2d 581; 21 N.Y.2d 729, 234 N.E.2d 714, appeal dismissed. Leon B. Polsky for appellant. Thomas J. Mackell and Peter J. O'Connor for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by Rule 11. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. Page 392 U.S. 667, 1
U.S. Supreme Court
TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968) 392 U.S. 667 TAGGART v. NEW YORK.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1668, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
20 N.Y.2d 335, 229 N.E.2d 581; 21 N.Y.2d 729, 234 N.E.2d 714, appeal dismissed. Leon B. Polsky for appellant. Thomas J. Mackell and Peter J. O'Connor for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by Rule 11. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. Page 392 U.S. 667, 1
Search This Case
