TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968)
392 U.S. 667 TAGGART v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1668, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
20 N.Y.2d 335, 229 N.E.2d 581; 21 N.Y.2d 729, 234 N.E.2d 714, appeal dismissed.
Leon B. Polsky for appellant.
Thomas J. Mackell and Peter J. O'Connor for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by Rule 11.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
U.S. Supreme Court
TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968)
392 U.S. 667 TAGGART v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1668, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
20 N.Y.2d 335, 229 N.E.2d 581; 21 N.Y.2d 729, 234 N.E.2d 714, appeal dismissed.
Leon B. Polsky for appellant.
Thomas J. Mackell and Peter J. O'Connor for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by Rule 11.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
Page 392 U.S. 667, 1
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
