TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968)

392 U.S. 667

TAGGART v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1668, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

20 N. Y. 2d 335, 229 N. E. 2d 581; 21 N. Y. 2d 729, 234 N. E. 2d 714, appeal dismissed.

Leon B. Polsky for appellant.

Thomas J. Mackell and Peter J. O'Connor for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by Rule 11.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

Page 392 U.S. 667, 1




U.S. Supreme Court

TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968)

392 U.S. 667

TAGGART v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1668, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

20 N. Y. 2d 335, 229 N. E. 2d 581; 21 N. Y. 2d 729, 234 N. E. 2d 714, appeal dismissed.

Leon B. Polsky for appellant.

Thomas J. Mackell and Peter J. O'Connor for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by Rule 11.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

Page 392 U.S. 667, 1

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.