McDANIEL v. NORTH CAROLINA, 392 U.S. 665 (1968)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

McDANIEL v. NORTH CAROLINA, 392 U.S. 665 (1968)

392 U.S. 665

McDANIEL v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 1599, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 272 N.C. 556, 158 S. E. 2d 874, vacated and remanded.

T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and George A. Goodwyn, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 219.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 228.

Page 392 U.S. 665, 666




U.S. Supreme Court

McDANIEL v. NORTH CAROLINA, 392 U.S. 665 (1968)

392 U.S. 665

McDANIEL v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 1599, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 272 N.C. 556, 158 S. E. 2d 874, vacated and remanded.

T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and George A. Goodwyn, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 219.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 228.

Page 392 U.S. 665, 666

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.