TOLES v. CLARK, 392 U.S. 662 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
TOLES v. CLARK, 392 U.S. 662 (1968)
392 U.S. 662 TOLES v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 933, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 385 F.2d 107, vacated and remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss the petition as moot.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summitt for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington with directions to dismiss the petition as moot.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
U.S. Supreme Court
TOLES v. CLARK, 392 U.S. 662 (1968)
392 U.S. 662 TOLES v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 933, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 385 F.2d 107, vacated and remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss the petition as moot.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summitt for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington with directions to dismiss the petition as moot.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
Page 392 U.S. 662, 663
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.