COPAS v. SCHMIDT, 392 U.S. 660 (1968)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

COPAS v. SCHMIDT, 392 U.S. 660 (1968)

392 U.S. 660

COPAS v. SCHMIDT, SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL
SERVICES OF WISCONSIN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. No. 45, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to substitute Wilbur J. Schmidt, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services, as the party respondent is granted. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are also granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin for further consideration in light of Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128.

Page 392 U.S. 660, 661




U.S. Supreme Court

COPAS v. SCHMIDT, 392 U.S. 660 (1968)

392 U.S. 660

COPAS v. SCHMIDT, SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL
SERVICES OF WISCONSIN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. No. 45, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to substitute Wilbur J. Schmidt, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services, as the party respondent is granted. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are also granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin for further consideration in light of Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128.

Page 392 U.S. 660, 661

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.