SULLIVAN v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., 392 U.S. 657 (1968)
Decided:
June 17, 1968
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SULLIVAN v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., 392 U.S. 657 (1968) 392 U.S. 657SULLIVAN ET AL. v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK,
INC., ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF
VIRGINIA. No. 1188.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Allison W. Brown, Jr., Robert M. Alexander, Jack Greenberg, and James M. Nabrit III for petitioners.
John Chas. Harris for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 409.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN'S dissenting opinion in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 449.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 1188.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Robert M. Alexander, Jack Greenberg, and James M. Nabrit III for petitioners. John Chas. Harris for respondents. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 409. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN'S dissenting opinion in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 449. Page 392 U.S. 657, 658
U.S. Supreme Court
SULLIVAN v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., 392 U.S. 657 (1968) 392 U.S. 657 SULLIVAN ET AL. v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., ET AL.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 1188.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Robert M. Alexander, Jack Greenberg, and James M. Nabrit III for petitioners. John Chas. Harris for respondents. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 409. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN'S dissenting opinion in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 449. Page 392 U.S. 657, 658
Search This Case
