SULLIVAN v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., 392 U.S. 657 (1968)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SULLIVAN v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., 392 U.S. 657 (1968)

392 U.S. 657

SULLIVAN ET AL. v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 1188.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., Robert M. Alexander, Jack Greenberg, and James M. Nabrit III for petitioners.

John Chas. Harris for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 409.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN'S dissenting opinion in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 449.

Page 392 U.S. 657, 658

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SULLIVAN v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., 392 U.S. 657 (1968)

392 U.S. 657

SULLIVAN ET AL. v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 1188.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., Robert M. Alexander, Jack Greenberg, and James M. Nabrit III for petitioners.

John Chas. Harris for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 409.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN'S dissenting opinion in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 449.

Page 392 U.S. 657, 658

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.