HENRY v. LOUISIANA, 392 U.S. 655 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
HENRY v. LOUISIANA, 392 U.S. 655 (1968)
392 U.S. 655 HENRY v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 932.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Appeal dismissed; certiorari granted; 250 La. 682, 198 So. 2d 889, reversed.
Thomas Barr III for appellant.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.
U.S. Supreme Court
HENRY v. LOUISIANA, 392 U.S. 655 (1968)
392 U.S. 655 HENRY v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 932.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Appeal dismissed; certiorari granted; 250 La. 682, 198 So. 2d 889, reversed.
Thomas Barr III for appellant.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.
Page 392 U.S. 655, 656
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.