PUENTES v. BD., ED., UNION FREE SCH. DIST., 392 U.S. 653 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

PUENTES v. BD., ED., UNION FREE SCH. DIST., 392 U.S. 653 (1968)

392 U.S. 653

PUENTES v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 21
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided June 17, 1968.

18 N.Y.2d 906, 223 N.E.2d 45; 19 N.Y.2d 809, 226 N.E.2d 701, vacated and remanded.

Ernest Fleischman for appellant.

Leo F. McGinity for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 392 U.S. 653, 654

 


U.S. Supreme Court

PUENTES v. BD., ED., UNION FREE SCH. DIST., 392 U.S. 653 (1968)

392 U.S. 653

PUENTES v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 21
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided June 17, 1968.

18 N.Y.2d 906, 223 N.E.2d 45; 19 N.Y.2d 809, 226 N.E.2d 701, vacated and remanded.

Ernest Fleischman for appellant.

Leo F. McGinity for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 392 U.S. 653, 654

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.