WHEAT v. WASHINGTON, 392 U.S. 652 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

WHEAT v. WASHINGTON, 392 U.S. 652 (1968)

392 U.S. 652

WHEAT v. WASHINGTON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1301, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1535, Misc., Aiken v. Washington, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted; 72 Wash. 2d 306, 434 P.2d 10, vacated and remanded.

Charles M. Stokes for petitioner in No. 1301, Misc. Anthony Savage, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1535, Misc.

James E. Kennedy for respondent in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases remanded to that court for reconsideration in the light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, and Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE BLACK's dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 532, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE's dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 540, and Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138.

Page 392 U.S. 652, 653

 


U.S. Supreme Court

WHEAT v. WASHINGTON, 392 U.S. 652 (1968)

392 U.S. 652

WHEAT v. WASHINGTON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1301, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1535, Misc., Aiken v. Washington, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted; 72 Wash. 2d 306, 434 P.2d 10, vacated and remanded.

Charles M. Stokes for petitioner in No. 1301, Misc. Anthony Savage, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1535, Misc.

James E. Kennedy for respondent in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases remanded to that court for reconsideration in the light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, and Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE BLACK's dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 532, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE's dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 540, and Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138.

Page 392 U.S. 652, 653

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.