COOK v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 646 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

COOK v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 646 (1968) 392 U.S. 646

COOK v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 1233, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent and would deny certiorari.

HEARD v. RIZZO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/392/646/">392 U.S. 646</a> (1968) 392 U.S. 646 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HEARD v. RIZZO, 392 U.S. 646 (1968) 392 U.S. 646

HEARD ET AL. v. RIZZO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1530, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1662, Misc., Traylor et al. v. Rizzo et al., also on appeal from the same court.

 281 F. Supp. 720, affirmed.

Lois G. Forer for appellants in No. 1530, Misc. William Kunstler for appellants in No. 1662, Misc.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgments are affirmed.

Page 392 U.S. 646, 647

 


U.S. Supreme Court

COOK v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 646 (1968) 392 U.S. 646

COOK v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 1233, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent and would deny certiorari.

HEARD v. RIZZO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/392/646/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/392/646/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/392/646/">392 U.S. 646</a></a></a> (1968) 392 U.S. 646 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HEARD v. RIZZO, 392 U.S. 646 (1968) 392 U.S. 646

HEARD ET AL. v. RIZZO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1530, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1662, Misc., Traylor et al. v. Rizzo et al., also on appeal from the same court.

 281 F. Supp. 720, affirmed.

Lois G. Forer for appellants in No. 1530, Misc. William Kunstler for appellants in No. 1662, Misc.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgments are affirmed.

Page 392 U.S. 646, 647

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.