CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV., 392 U.S. 642 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV., 392 U.S. 642 (1968) 392 U.S. 642

CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD
CIRCUIT. No. 637.
Decided June 17, 1968.

 381 F.2d 542, affirmed.

Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Julia P. Cooper for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/392/642/case.html">392 U.S. 642</a> (1968) 392 U.S. 642 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 642 (1968) 392 U.S. 642

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1401.
Decided June 17, 1968.

282 F. Supp. 46, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall and Harvey Gelb for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al., and Carl Helmetag, Jr., for Penn Central Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 392 U.S. 642, 643

 


U.S. Supreme Court

CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV., 392 U.S. 642 (1968) 392 U.S. 642

CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD
CIRCUIT. No. 637.
Decided June 17, 1968.

 381 F.2d 542, affirmed.

Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Julia P. Cooper for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/392/642/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/392/642/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/392/642/">392 U.S. 642</a></a></a> (1968) 392 U.S. 642 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 642 (1968) 392 U.S. 642

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1401.
Decided June 17, 1968.

282 F. Supp. 46, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall and Harvey Gelb for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al., and Carl Helmetag, Jr., for Penn Central Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 392 U.S. 642, 643

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.