NELSON v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 303 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
NELSON v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 303 (1968)
392 U.S. 303 NELSON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 78, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 375 F.2d 739, vacated and remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
NELSON v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 303 (1968)
392 U.S. 303 NELSON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 78, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 375 F.2d 739, vacated and remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 392 U.S. 303, 304
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
