JONES v. LOUISIANA, 392 U.S. 302 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. LOUISIANA, 392 U.S. 302 (1968)

392 U.S. 302

JONES v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 1255.
Decided June 10, 1968.

251 La. 431, 204 So. 2d 775, appeal dismissed.

Billy R. Pesnell for appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, and grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissent.

Page 392 U.S. 302, 303

 


U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. LOUISIANA, 392 U.S. 302 (1968)

392 U.S. 302

JONES v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 1255.
Decided June 10, 1968.

251 La. 431, 204 So. 2d 775, appeal dismissed.

Billy R. Pesnell for appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, and grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissent.

Page 392 U.S. 302, 303

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.