PICKENS v. OLIVER, 392 U.S. 300 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
PICKENS v. OLIVER, 392 U.S. 300 (1968)
392 U.S. 300 PICKENS v. OLIVER, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1076.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
George T. Davis for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Derald E. Granberg, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).
U.S. Supreme Court
PICKENS v. OLIVER, 392 U.S. 300 (1968)
392 U.S. 300 PICKENS v. OLIVER, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1076.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
George T. Davis for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Derald E. Granberg, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).
Page 392 U.S. 300, 301
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
